site stats

Harmon v shell oil

WebDocket for Harmon v. Shell Oil Company, 3:20-cv-00021 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. WebPlaintiffs Charles Harmon, Brian Coble, and David Lawrence (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are current or former employees of Shell Oil Co. (“Shell”) and beneficiaries of Shell's defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan, the Shell Provident Fund 401(k) Plan (the “Plan”).

Fidelity Escapes Claims Over Use of Workers’ 401(k) Plan Data

WebBACKGROUND. Plaintiffs Charles Harmon, Brian Coble, and David Lawrence (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are current or former employees of Shell Oil Co. (“Shell”) and beneficiaries of Shell's defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan, the … WebApr 14, 2024 · In one of the most recent cases, Harmon v. Shell Oil Co., 2024 WL 1232694 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2024), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected the argument that plan... new starter checklist form 2022 https://fredlenhardt.net

Judge Won’t OK Interlocutory Appeal Of Ruling Allowing Jury Trial …

WebApr 14, 2024 · In one of the most recent cases, Harmon v. Shell Oil Co. , 2024 WL 1232694 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2024), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected the argument that plan ... WebHarmon et al v Shell Oil Company: MOTION for Summary Judgment Motions referred to Andrew M Edison. by Shell Oil Company, Trustees of Shell Provident Fund, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/6/2024. Harmon et al v Shell Oil Company WebHarmon v. Shell Oil Company (procedural ruling issued on March 30, 2024 by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas): The plaintiffs here are participants in the defendant plan sponsor’s 401 (k) plan, but the plaintiffs also named several other parties as … new starter checklist form download

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE …

Category:Karen D. Ng - Labor & Employment - Nixon Peabody LLP

Tags:Harmon v shell oil

Harmon v shell oil

401(k) Participants Can Be Prime Targets of Cross-Selling Efforts

WebThe case is Harmon et al. v. Shell Oil Company et al., case number 3:20-cv-00021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas. --Editing by John Campbell. For a reprint of this ... WebApr 1, 2024 · (Charles Harmon v. Shell Oil Company, no. 3:20-cv-0021, S.D. Texas, Galveston Division). Recent Similar Decisions. This decision follows on the heels of the Divane v. Northwestern case in which the same charge was also rejected. The district court’s decision in Divane was affirmed by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. …

Harmon v shell oil

Did you know?

WebCurrent and former Shell Oil workers can't have their claims that the energy giant mismanaged their retirement savings heard by a jury, a Texas federal judge ruled Monday, saying a 2011 U.S ... WebJan 29, 2024 · Harmon et al. v. Shell Oil Company et al. A proposed class action claims Shell Oil Company and Fidelity have caused participants in the Shell Provident Fund 401 (k) Plan to lose millions of dollars by failing to act in their best interests.

WebJul 15, 2024 · Recent litigation called into question whether plan data could be considered a “plan asset.” In one of the most recent cases, Harmon v. Shell Oil Co., 2024 WL 1232694 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2024), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas rejected the argument that plan assets include plan data. Web64 rows · Jan 24, 2024 · Harmon et al v Shell Oil Company 3:2024cv00021 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Justia. Harmon et al v Shell Oil Company. Plaintiff: Charles Harmon, David E. Lawrence, Asur M. Vallejos and Brian D. Coble. Case Number: 3:2024cv00021. Filed: January 24, 2024.

WebNov 7, 2024 · Harmon V. Shell Oil — a new area of law — the plaintiffs here have said that anything of value with regard to the plan is a plan asset. However, the court here cited definitions of plan assets in Labor Department regulations, and affirmed that assets are investments or contributions — not participant data. Berkelhammer v. WebJan 21, 2024 · Shell Oil Company, et. al. et al 3:2024cv00024 US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Justia Harmon et al v. Shell Oil Company, et. al. et al RSS Track this Docket Docket Report This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER .

WebCalifornia Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program, and the rise in ERISA privacy and cybersecurity lawsuits in Harmon et al. v. Shell Oil Co. et al. Ideas What’s new with employee stock ownership plans

WebCHARLES HARMON, BRIAN COBLE, ASUR VALLEJOS, DAVID LAWRENCE, individually and as representatives of a class of participants and beneficiaries of the Shell Provident Fund 401(k) Plan, Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, CYNTHIA A.P. DEERE, SCOTT G. BALLARD, PAUL GOODFELLOW, RHOMAN J. HARDY, EILEEN M. PERILLO, … new starter checklist if self employedWebThe case is Harmon et al. v. Shell Oil Co., case number 3:20-cv-00021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas.--Editing by Roy LeBlanc. midlands massage therapyWebJan 21, 2024 · On 01/21/2024 Harmon filed a Labor - Employee Benefit court case against Shell Oil Company, in U.S. District Courts. Court records for this case are available from Texas Southern District Court. Harmon et al v Shell Oil Company, et al et al 3:22-CV-00024 Court Records - UniCourt new starter checklist from gov.ukWebJan 24, 2024 · On 01/24/2024 Harmon filed a Labor - Employee Benefit lawsuit against Shell Oil Company. This case was filed in U.S. District Courts, Texas Southern District Court. The Judge overseeing this case is Jeffrey V Brown. The case status is Pending - … midlands manor howickWebLikewise, in the last six months, additional courts have struck identical jury demands in non-university cases by Plaintiffs’ counsel, including” in Harmon v. Shell Oil Co., No. 3:20-cv-00021, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41438 (S.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2024). midlands mascorWebCHARLES HARMON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00021 . Oral Argument Requested . PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO . FIDELITY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. 91] Case 3:20-cv-00021 Document 93 Filed on 07/06/20 in TXSD Page 1 of 38; i ; midland smash repairs wanew starter checklist for managers